FhSim  3.1.0
Marine systems simulation
Loading...
Searching...
No Matches
Validation: MF2022 towed panels (L1-L4)

Table of Contents

Moe Føre, Endresen and Bjelland (2022), the anchor dataset (ADR 0005): eight Raschel knitted nets towed at 0° and 45°. Loads are asserted tightly here (L1-L3). The same checks through the Net/NetStructure SimObject are on Validation: towed panel through the SimObject (S1).

Known misfit, disclosed by owner decision (2026-09-27). The default law's two-harmonic KF2012 Eq. 14 angle form misfits MF2022 lift at high solidity (CL(45°) 26–31 % low for N33a, N36a and N33b; N33a lift 196 N against 271 N) and the angle dependence of Rudi, Løland and Zhan at 60–80° (Rudi drag ratio low by up to 0.154, lift ratio by up to 0.358; Løland C_L outside ±25 % in 31 of 80 rows; Zhan R60/R0 off by up to −0.184, speed trend up to +38.7 %). The L9 refit (a3 = 0.046, b4 = 0.050) leaves 16 of 66 L5/L8 checks failing, as the defaults do, so the form itself misfits. The owner chose to disclose this now and to replace the angle form later (0131 — Default law: replace the two-harmonic angle form with three harmonics, refitted to MF2022, Rudi, Løland and Zhan); the 11 load-law tests that fail stay DISABLED_ (0110 — Default load law misses lift at high solidity and the angle dependence of Rudi, Løland and Zhan (A6 disabled tests)), and nothing is tuned to pass them. Details: 11.4 The default law's angle form misfits lift and 60–80° (MARE-0110).

Generated 2026-10-03 from commit 87e60a3 2026-10-03; tests run 2026-10-03T09:10:34.294 (main entry) and 2026-10-03T09:11:16.576 (VALIDATION entry).

Tests

Status from the gtest XML of the last run. A DISABLED_ test fails against the current laws; its numbers are in the tables below, and it stays disabled until the owner decides the issue.

Test Source Status Issues Owner question
PanelLoadLaw_MF2022.DISABLED_L1_Eq10LiftAtRn2000_LocalThroughFlow PanelLoadLaw_MF2022_Test.cpp:177 DISABLED MARE-0093 (resolved), MARE-0110, MARE-0131 –
PanelLoadLaw_MF2022.DISABLED_L2_TextLiftAt1p75_LocalThroughFlow PanelLoadLaw_MF2022_Test.cpp:202 DISABLED MARE-0093 (resolved), MARE-0110, MARE-0131 –
PanelLoadLaw_MF2022.DISABLED_L2_TextLiftAt1p75_ScreenMF2022 PanelLoadLaw_MF2022_Test.cpp:215 DISABLED MARE-0093 (resolved), MARE-0110, MARE-0131 –
PanelLoadLaw_MF2022.DISABLED_L4_LocalCdPlateauAt0Deg PanelLoadLaw_MF2022_Test.cpp:233 DISABLED MARE-0093 (resolved), MARE-0110, MARE-0131 –
PanelLoadLaw_MF2022.L1_Eq10DragAtRn2000_LocalThroughFlow PanelLoadLaw_MF2022_Test.cpp:167 passed – –
PanelLoadLaw_MF2022.L1_Eq10DragAtRn2000_ScreenMF2022 PanelLoadLaw_MF2022_Test.cpp:182 passed – –
PanelLoadLaw_MF2022.L1_Eq10LiftAtRn2000_ScreenMF2022 PanelLoadLaw_MF2022_Test.cpp:187 passed – –
PanelLoadLaw_MF2022.L2_TextDragAt1p75_LocalThroughFlow PanelLoadLaw_MF2022_Test.cpp:194 passed – –
PanelLoadLaw_MF2022.L2_TextDragAt1p75_ScreenMF2022 PanelLoadLaw_MF2022_Test.cpp:207 passed – –
PanelLoadLaw_MF2022.L3_SpeedTrendN19aN36a_LocalThroughFlow PanelLoadLaw_MF2022_Test.cpp:222 passed – –
PanelLoadLaw_MF2022.L4_LocalCdPlateauAt45Deg PanelLoadLaw_MF2022_Test.cpp:239 passed – –
PanelLoadLaw_MF2022.WritesReport PanelLoadLaw_MF2022_Test.cpp:246 passed – –

PanelLoadLaw MF2022 report

tests/out/PanelLoadLaw_MF2022_report.txt, as the test wrote it.

PanelLoadLaw MF2022 report (plan L1-L4, MARE-0093). Anchor dataset, ADR 0005.

Conventions: error = model/measured - 1 (in %) for loads and coefficients, model - measured for ratios and localCd; ratio = measured/model; margin = tolerance - |error| (negative = fails).

Setup from mf2022_table2_nets.csv notes: panel area 1.196775 m^2, rho 998.0, nu 1e-06.

Readings: Rn = U t / nu (MF2022 Eq. 4, free-stream U, Table 2 t); Eq. 10 at Rn = 2000 means U = Rn nu / t per net; Sn = Snm. L3 asserts N19a and N36a absolute drag; L4 asserts localCd at the digitised (net, Rn > 1500) points against the text plateau.

L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted)

asserted; 16 rows, 0 of 16 outside the tolerance.

Chart: L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted); L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted).

Model minus measurement per case with the tolerance band L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted) L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted) L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted) L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted) tolerance ±10 % -10 -5 0 5 10 model / measured − 1 [%]; shaded: tolerance N19a Snm 0.193 CD( 0) U 2.857 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 CD( 0) U 2.857: measured 0.2174, model 0.2285, error 5.111 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 CD( 0) U 2.857: measured 0.2174, model 0.2174, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 % N19a Snm 0.193 CD(45) U 2.857 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 CD(45) U 2.857: measured 0.1329, model 0.1389, error 4.515 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 CD(45) U 2.857: measured 0.1329, model 0.1329, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 % N26a Snm 0.262 CD( 0) U 2.857 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N26a Snm 0.262 CD( 0) U 2.857: measured 0.3463, model 0.3331, error -3.809 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N26a Snm 0.262 CD( 0) U 2.857: measured 0.3463, model 0.3463, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 % N26a Snm 0.262 CD(45) U 2.857 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N26a Snm 0.262 CD(45) U 2.857: measured 0.2133, model 0.2025, error -5.057 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N26a Snm 0.262 CD(45) U 2.857: measured 0.2133, model 0.2133, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 % N33a Snm 0.331 CD( 0) U 1.000 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 CD( 0) U 1.000: measured 0.4921, model 0.4585, error -6.834 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 CD( 0) U 1.000: measured 0.4921, model 0.4921, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 % N33a Snm 0.331 CD(45) U 1.000 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 CD(45) U 1.000: measured 0.2937, model 0.2788, error -5.077 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 CD(45) U 1.000: measured 0.2937, model 0.2937, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 % N36a Snm 0.364 CD( 0) U 1.333 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 CD( 0) U 1.333: measured 0.5679, model 0.5286, error -6.916 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 CD( 0) U 1.333: measured 0.5679, model 0.5679, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 % N36a Snm 0.364 CD(45) U 1.333 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 CD(45) U 1.333: measured 0.3322, model 0.3214, error -3.228 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 CD(45) U 1.333: measured 0.3322, model 0.3322, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 % N18b Snm 0.185 CD( 0) U 0.800 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N18b Snm 0.185 CD( 0) U 0.800: measured 0.2035, model 0.2174, error 6.809 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N18b Snm 0.185 CD( 0) U 0.800: measured 0.2035, model 0.2035, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 % N18b Snm 0.185 CD(45) U 0.800 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N18b Snm 0.185 CD(45) U 0.800: measured 0.1236, model 0.1322, error 6.935 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N18b Snm 0.185 CD(45) U 0.800: measured 0.1236, model 0.1236, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 % N20b Snm 0.199 CD( 0) U 0.800 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N20b Snm 0.199 CD( 0) U 0.800: measured 0.2279, model 0.2369, error 3.960 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N20b Snm 0.199 CD( 0) U 0.800: measured 0.2279, model 0.2279, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 % N20b Snm 0.199 CD(45) U 0.800 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N20b Snm 0.199 CD(45) U 0.800: measured 0.1399, model 0.1441, error 2.965 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N20b Snm 0.199 CD(45) U 0.800: measured 0.1399, model 0.1399, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 % N26b Snm 0.257 CD( 0) U 1.000 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N26b Snm 0.257 CD( 0) U 1.000: measured 0.3363, model 0.3249, error -3.408 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N26b Snm 0.257 CD( 0) U 1.000: measured 0.3363, model 0.3363, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 % N26b Snm 0.257 CD(45) U 1.000 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N26b Snm 0.257 CD(45) U 1.000: measured 0.2075, model 0.1976, error -4.790 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N26b Snm 0.257 CD(45) U 1.000: measured 0.2075, model 0.2075, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 % N33b Snm 0.328 CD( 0) U 1.538 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N33b Snm 0.328 CD( 0) U 1.538: measured 0.4854, model 0.4525, error -6.786 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N33b Snm 0.328 CD( 0) U 1.538: measured 0.4854, model 0.4854, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 % N33b Snm 0.328 CD(45) U 1.538 L1 LocalThroughFlow, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N33b Snm 0.328 CD(45) U 1.538: measured 0.2902, model 0.2752, error -5.192 %, tolerance ±10 % L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N33b Snm 0.328 CD(45) U 1.538: measured 0.2902, model 0.2902, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±10 %

Case Measured Model Error Tolerance Margin Result
N19a Snm 0.193 CD( 0) U 2.857 0.2174 0.2285 5.111 % ±10.000 % 4.889 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 CD(45) U 2.857 0.1329 0.1389 4.515 % ±10.000 % 5.485 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 CD( 0) U 2.857 0.3463 0.3331 -3.809 % ±10.000 % 6.191 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 CD(45) U 2.857 0.2133 0.2025 -5.057 % ±10.000 % 4.943 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 CD( 0) U 1.000 0.4921 0.4585 -6.834 % ±10.000 % 3.166 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 CD(45) U 1.000 0.2937 0.2788 -5.077 % ±10.000 % 4.923 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 CD( 0) U 1.333 0.5679 0.5286 -6.916 % ±10.000 % 3.084 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 CD(45) U 1.333 0.3322 0.3214 -3.228 % ±10.000 % 6.772 % within
N18b Snm 0.185 CD( 0) U 0.800 0.2035 0.2174 6.809 % ±10.000 % 3.191 % within
N18b Snm 0.185 CD(45) U 0.800 0.1236 0.1322 6.935 % ±10.000 % 3.065 % within
N20b Snm 0.199 CD( 0) U 0.800 0.2279 0.2369 3.960 % ±10.000 % 6.040 % within
N20b Snm 0.199 CD(45) U 0.800 0.1399 0.1441 2.965 % ±10.000 % 7.035 % within
N26b Snm 0.257 CD( 0) U 1.000 0.3363 0.3249 -3.408 % ±10.000 % 6.592 % within
N26b Snm 0.257 CD(45) U 1.000 0.2075 0.1976 -4.790 % ±10.000 % 5.210 % within
N33b Snm 0.328 CD( 0) U 1.538 0.4854 0.4525 -6.786 % ±10.000 % 3.214 % within
N33b Snm 0.328 CD(45) U 1.538 0.2902 0.2752 -5.192 % ±10.000 % 4.808 % within

L1 LocalThroughFlow, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (DISABLED_, fails)

DISABLED test; 8 rows, 3 of 8 outside the tolerance.

Chart: L1 LocalThroughFlow, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (DISABLED_, fails); L1 ScreenMF2022, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (asserted).

Model minus measurement per case with the tolerance band L1 LocalThroughFlow, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (DISABLED_, fails) L1 LocalThroughFlow, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (DISABLED_, fails) L1 ScreenMF2022, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (asserted) L1 ScreenMF2022, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (asserted) tolerance ±25 % -20 0 20 model / measured − 1 [%]; shaded: tolerance N19a Snm 0.193 CL(45) U 2.857 L1 LocalThroughFlow, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (DISABLED_, fails): N19a Snm 0.193 CL(45) U 2.857: measured 0.04318, model 0.04956, error 14.765 %, tolerance ±25 % L1 ScreenMF2022, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 CL(45) U 2.857: measured 0.04318, model 0.04318, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±25 % N26a Snm 0.262 CL(45) U 2.857 L1 LocalThroughFlow, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (DISABLED_, fails): N26a Snm 0.262 CL(45) U 2.857: measured 0.08136, model 0.07264, error -10.717 %, tolerance ±25 % L1 ScreenMF2022, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N26a Snm 0.262 CL(45) U 2.857: measured 0.08136, model 0.08136, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±25 % N33a Snm 0.331 CL(45) U 1.000 L1 LocalThroughFlow, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (DISABLED_, fails): N33a Snm 0.331 CL(45) U 1.000: measured 0.1357, model 0.1007, error -25.760 %, tolerance ±25 % L1 ScreenMF2022, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 CL(45) U 1.000: measured 0.1357, model 0.1357, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±25 % N36a Snm 0.364 CL(45) U 1.333 L1 LocalThroughFlow, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (DISABLED_, fails): N36a Snm 0.364 CL(45) U 1.333: measured 0.1673, model 0.1166, error -30.312 %, tolerance ±25 % L1 ScreenMF2022, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 CL(45) U 1.333: measured 0.1673, model 0.1673, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±25 % N18b Snm 0.185 CL(45) U 0.800 L1 LocalThroughFlow, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (DISABLED_, fails): N18b Snm 0.185 CL(45) U 0.800: measured 0.0398, model 0.04712, error 18.409 %, tolerance ±25 % L1 ScreenMF2022, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N18b Snm 0.185 CL(45) U 0.800: measured 0.0398, model 0.0398, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±25 % N20b Snm 0.199 CL(45) U 0.800 L1 LocalThroughFlow, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (DISABLED_, fails): N20b Snm 0.199 CL(45) U 0.800: measured 0.04586, model 0.05141, error 12.102 %, tolerance ±25 % L1 ScreenMF2022, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N20b Snm 0.199 CL(45) U 0.800: measured 0.04586, model 0.04586, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±25 % N26b Snm 0.257 CL(45) U 1.000 L1 LocalThroughFlow, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (DISABLED_, fails): N26b Snm 0.257 CL(45) U 1.000: measured 0.07805, model 0.07082, error -9.260 %, tolerance ±25 % L1 ScreenMF2022, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N26b Snm 0.257 CL(45) U 1.000: measured 0.07805, model 0.07805, error 0.000 %, tolerance ±25 % N33b Snm 0.328 CL(45) U 1.538 L1 LocalThroughFlow, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (DISABLED_, fails): N33b Snm 0.328 CL(45) U 1.538: measured 0.133, model 0.09936, error -25.273 %, tolerance ±25 % L1 ScreenMF2022, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (asserted): N33b Snm 0.328 CL(45) U 1.538: measured 0.133, model 0.133, error -0.000 %, tolerance ±25 %

Case Measured Model Error Tolerance Margin Result
N19a Snm 0.193 CL(45) U 2.857 0.04318 0.04956 14.765 % ±25.000 % 10.235 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 CL(45) U 2.857 0.08136 0.07264 -10.717 % ±25.000 % 14.283 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 CL(45) U 1.000 0.1357 0.1007 -25.760 % ±25.000 % -0.760 % outside
N36a Snm 0.364 CL(45) U 1.333 0.1673 0.1166 -30.312 % ±25.000 % -5.312 % outside
N18b Snm 0.185 CL(45) U 0.800 0.0398 0.04712 18.409 % ±25.000 % 6.591 % within
N20b Snm 0.199 CL(45) U 0.800 0.04586 0.05141 12.102 % ±25.000 % 12.898 % within
N26b Snm 0.257 CL(45) U 1.000 0.07805 0.07082 -9.260 % ±25.000 % 15.740 % within
N33b Snm 0.328 CL(45) U 1.538 0.133 0.09936 -25.273 % ±25.000 % -0.273 % outside

L1 ScreenMF2022, drag coefficients vs Eq. 10 (asserted)

asserted; 16 rows, 0 of 16 outside the tolerance.

Case Measured Model Error Tolerance Margin Result
N19a Snm 0.193 CD( 0) U 2.857 0.2174 0.2174 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 CD(45) U 2.857 0.1329 0.1329 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 CD( 0) U 2.857 0.3463 0.3463 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 CD(45) U 2.857 0.2133 0.2133 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 CD( 0) U 1.000 0.4921 0.4921 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 CD(45) U 1.000 0.2937 0.2937 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 CD( 0) U 1.333 0.5679 0.5679 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 CD(45) U 1.333 0.3322 0.3322 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within
N18b Snm 0.185 CD( 0) U 0.800 0.2035 0.2035 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within
N18b Snm 0.185 CD(45) U 0.800 0.1236 0.1236 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within
N20b Snm 0.199 CD( 0) U 0.800 0.2279 0.2279 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within
N20b Snm 0.199 CD(45) U 0.800 0.1399 0.1399 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within
N26b Snm 0.257 CD( 0) U 1.000 0.3363 0.3363 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within
N26b Snm 0.257 CD(45) U 1.000 0.2075 0.2075 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within
N33b Snm 0.328 CD( 0) U 1.538 0.4854 0.4854 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within
N33b Snm 0.328 CD(45) U 1.538 0.2902 0.2902 0.000 % ±10.000 % 10.000 % within

L1 ScreenMF2022, lift coefficient vs Eq. 10 (asserted)

asserted; 8 rows, 0 of 8 outside the tolerance.

Case Measured Model Error Tolerance Margin Result
N19a Snm 0.193 CL(45) U 2.857 0.04318 0.04318 0.000 % ±25.000 % 25.000 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 CL(45) U 2.857 0.08136 0.08136 0.000 % ±25.000 % 25.000 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 CL(45) U 1.000 0.1357 0.1357 0.000 % ±25.000 % 25.000 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 CL(45) U 1.333 0.1673 0.1673 0.000 % ±25.000 % 25.000 % within
N18b Snm 0.185 CL(45) U 0.800 0.0398 0.0398 0.000 % ±25.000 % 25.000 % within
N20b Snm 0.199 CL(45) U 0.800 0.04586 0.04586 0.000 % ±25.000 % 25.000 % within
N26b Snm 0.257 CL(45) U 1.000 0.07805 0.07805 0.000 % ±25.000 % 25.000 % within
N33b Snm 0.328 CL(45) U 1.538 0.133 0.133 -0.000 % ±25.000 % 25.000 % within

L2 LocalThroughFlow, text drag (asserted)

asserted; 2 rows, 0 of 2 outside the tolerance.

Chart: L2 LocalThroughFlow, text drag (asserted); L2 ScreenMF2022, text drag (asserted).

Model minus measurement per case with the tolerance band L2 LocalThroughFlow, text drag (asserted) L2 LocalThroughFlow, text drag (asserted) L2 ScreenMF2022, text drag (asserted) L2 ScreenMF2022, text drag (asserted) tolerance ±15 % -10 0 10 model / measured − 1 [%]; shaded: tolerance N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] L2 LocalThroughFlow, text drag (asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 416, model 420.5, error 1.081 %, tolerance ±15 % L2 ScreenMF2022, text drag (asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 416, model 397.6, error -4.432 %, tolerance ±15 % N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] L2 LocalThroughFlow, text drag (asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 934, model 996.5, error 6.691 %, tolerance ±15 % L2 ScreenMF2022, text drag (asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 934, model 1039, error 11.194 %, tolerance ±15 %

Case Measured Model Error Tolerance Margin Result
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 416 420.5 1.081 % ±15.000 % 13.919 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 934 996.5 6.691 % ±15.000 % 8.309 % within

L2 LocalThroughFlow, text lift (DISABLED_, fails)

DISABLED test; 2 rows, 1 of 2 outside the tolerance.

Chart: L2 LocalThroughFlow, text lift (DISABLED_, fails); L2 ScreenMF2022, text lift (DISABLED_, fails).

Model minus measurement per case with the tolerance band L2 LocalThroughFlow, text lift (DISABLED_, fails) L2 LocalThroughFlow, text lift (DISABLED_, fails) L2 ScreenMF2022, text lift (DISABLED_, fails) L2 ScreenMF2022, text lift (DISABLED_, fails) tolerance ±15 % -20 -10 0 10 model / measured − 1 [%]; shaded: tolerance N19a Snm 0.193 lift 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] L2 LocalThroughFlow, text lift (DISABLED_, fails): N19a Snm 0.193 lift 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 102, model 91.21, error -10.580 %, tolerance ±15 % L2 ScreenMF2022, text lift (DISABLED_, fails): N19a Snm 0.193 lift 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 102, model 78.97, error -22.574 %, tolerance ±15 % N33a Snm 0.331 lift 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] L2 LocalThroughFlow, text lift (DISABLED_, fails): N33a Snm 0.331 lift 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 271, model 197.2, error -27.246 %, tolerance ±15 % L2 ScreenMF2022, text lift (DISABLED_, fails): N33a Snm 0.331 lift 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 271, model 248.1, error -8.447 %, tolerance ±15 %

Case Measured Model Error Tolerance Margin Result
N19a Snm 0.193 lift 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 102 91.21 -10.580 % ±15.000 % 4.420 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 lift 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 271 197.2 -27.246 % ±15.000 % -12.246 % outside

L2 ScreenMF2022, text drag (asserted)

asserted; 2 rows, 0 of 2 outside the tolerance.

Case Measured Model Error Tolerance Margin Result
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 416 397.6 -4.432 % ±15.000 % 10.568 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 934 1039 11.194 % ±15.000 % 3.806 % within

L2 ScreenMF2022, text lift (DISABLED_, fails)

DISABLED test; 2 rows, 1 of 2 outside the tolerance.

Case Measured Model Error Tolerance Margin Result
N19a Snm 0.193 lift 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 102 78.97 -22.574 % ±15.000 % -7.574 % outside
N33a Snm 0.331 lift 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 271 248.1 -8.447 % ±15.000 % 6.553 % within

L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted)

asserted; 39 rows, 1 of 39 outside the tolerance.

Chart: L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted); L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported).

Model minus measurement per case with the tolerance band L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted) L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted) L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported) L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported) tolerance ±20 % -20 -10 0 10 20 model / measured − 1 [%]; shaded: tolerance N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N]: measured 97, model 82.12, error -15.345 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N]: measured 97, model 84.78, error -12.598 %, tolerance ±20 % N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 200, model 175.9, error -12.037 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 200, model 190.8, error -4.623 %, tolerance ±20 % N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 342, model 310.6, error -9.184 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 342, model 339.1, error -0.843 %, tolerance ±20 % N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.25 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.25 m/s [N]: measured 523, model 490.6, error -6.198 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.25 m/s [N]: measured 523, model 529.9, error 1.314 %, tolerance ±20 % N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 933, model 996.5, error 6.805 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 933, model 1039, error 11.313 %, tolerance ±20 % N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N]: measured 92, model 68.92, error -25.090 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N]: measured 92, model 73.47, error -20.141 %, tolerance ±20 % N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 183, model 151.9, error -16.999 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 183, model 165.3, error -9.668 %, tolerance ±20 % N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 316, model 273.8, error -13.356 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 316, model 293.9, error -7.000 %, tolerance ±20 % N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 1.35 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 1.35 m/s [N]: measured 579, model 515.5, error -10.962 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 1.35 m/s [N]: measured 579, model 535.6, error -7.496 %, tolerance ±20 % N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 908, model 896.2, error -1.301 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 908, model 900, error -0.880 %, tolerance ±20 % N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N]: measured 59, model 61.59, error 4.398 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N]: measured 59, model 51.7, error -12.381 %, tolerance ±20 % N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 121, model 127.9, error 5.742 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 121, model 116.3, error -3.872 %, tolerance ±20 % N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 211, model 214.7, error 1.740 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 211, model 206.8, error -1.999 %, tolerance ±20 % N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 1.35 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 1.35 m/s [N]: measured 380, model 372.1, error -2.087 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 1.35 m/s [N]: measured 380, model 376.9, error -0.826 %, tolerance ±20 % N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 609, model 608.4, error -0.102 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 609, model 633.3, error 3.985 %, tolerance ±20 % N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N]: measured 37, model 42.8, error 15.675 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N]: measured 37, model 32.45, error -12.286 %, tolerance ±20 % N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 81, model 89.05, error 9.933 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 81, model 73.02, error -9.850 %, tolerance ±20 % N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 143, model 149.3, error 4.405 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 143, model 129.8, error -9.219 %, tolerance ±20 % N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.25 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.25 m/s [N]: measured 218, model 224, error 2.742 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.25 m/s [N]: measured 218, model 202.8, error -6.955 %, tolerance ±20 % N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 415, model 420.5, error 1.324 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 415, model 397.6, error -4.202 %, tolerance ±20 % N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 0.50 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 0.50 m/s [N]: measured 48, model 49.94, error 4.031 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 0.50 m/s [N]: measured 48, model 49.59, error 3.314 %, tolerance ±20 % N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 111, model 107, error -3.619 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 111, model 111.6, error 0.522 %, tolerance ±20 % N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 200, model 188.9, error -5.563 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 200, model 198.4, error -0.819 %, tolerance ±20 % N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 1.25 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 1.25 m/s [N]: measured 308, model 298.3, error -3.140 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 1.25 m/s [N]: measured 308, model 309.9, error 0.631 %, tolerance ±20 % N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 578, model 606, error 4.840 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 578, model 607.5, error 5.101 %, tolerance ±20 % N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 103, model 92.37, error -10.324 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 103, model 98.66, error -4.209 %, tolerance ±20 % N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 175, model 166.5, error -4.858 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 175, model 175.4, error 0.231 %, tolerance ±20 % N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 1.35 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 1.35 m/s [N]: measured 326, model 313.5, error -3.834 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 1.35 m/s [N]: measured 326, model 319.7, error -1.941 %, tolerance ±20 % N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 527, model 545, error 3.412 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 527, model 537.2, error 1.931 %, tolerance ±20 % N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 0.50 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 0.50 m/s [N]: measured 32, model 37.46, error 17.052 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 0.50 m/s [N]: measured 32, model 31.85, error -0.470 %, tolerance ±20 % N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 70, model 77.81, error 11.153 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 70, model 71.66, error 2.374 %, tolerance ±20 % N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 127, model 130.5, error 2.791 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 127, model 127.4, error 0.314 %, tolerance ±20 % N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 1.35 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 1.35 m/s [N]: measured 233, model 226.3, error -2.892 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 1.35 m/s [N]: measured 233, model 232.2, error -0.350 %, tolerance ±20 % N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 370, model 370, error -0.010 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 370, model 390.2, error 5.448 %, tolerance ±20 % N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 0.50 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 0.50 m/s [N]: measured 22, model 26.03, error 18.304 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 0.50 m/s [N]: measured 22, model 19.85, error -9.780 %, tolerance ±20 % N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 50, model 54.15, error 8.299 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N]: measured 50, model 44.66, error -10.682 %, tolerance ±20 % N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 87, model 90.79, error 4.357 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N]: measured 87, model 79.39, error -8.743 %, tolerance ±20 % N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 1.25 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 1.25 m/s [N]: measured 137, model 136.2, error -0.582 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 1.25 m/s [N]: measured 137, model 124.1, error -9.451 %, tolerance ±20 % N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] L3 LocalThroughFlow, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (N19a and N36a asserted): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 252, model 255.7, error 1.472 %, tolerance ±20 % L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported): N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N]: measured 252, model 243.1, error -3.515 %, tolerance ±20 %

Case Measured Model Error Tolerance Margin Result
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N] 97 82.12 -15.345 % ±20.000 % 4.655 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 200 175.9 -12.037 % ±20.000 % 7.963 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 342 310.6 -9.184 % ±20.000 % 10.816 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.25 m/s [N] 523 490.6 -6.198 % ±20.000 % 13.802 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 933 996.5 6.805 % ±20.000 % 13.195 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N] 92 68.92 -25.090 % ±20.000 % -5.090 % outside
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 183 151.9 -16.999 % ±20.000 % 3.001 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 316 273.8 -13.356 % ±20.000 % 6.644 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 1.35 m/s [N] 579 515.5 -10.962 % ±20.000 % 9.038 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 908 896.2 -1.301 % ±20.000 % 18.699 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N] 59 61.59 4.398 % ±20.000 % 15.602 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 121 127.9 5.742 % ±20.000 % 14.258 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 211 214.7 1.740 % ±20.000 % 18.260 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 1.35 m/s [N] 380 372.1 -2.087 % ±20.000 % 17.913 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 609 608.4 -0.102 % ±20.000 % 19.898 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N] 37 42.8 15.675 % ±20.000 % 4.325 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 81 89.05 9.933 % ±20.000 % 10.067 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 143 149.3 4.405 % ±20.000 % 15.595 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.25 m/s [N] 218 224 2.742 % ±20.000 % 17.258 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 415 420.5 1.324 % ±20.000 % 18.676 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 0.50 m/s [N] 48 49.94 4.031 % ±20.000 % 15.969 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 111 107 -3.619 % ±20.000 % 16.381 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 200 188.9 -5.563 % ±20.000 % 14.437 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 1.25 m/s [N] 308 298.3 -3.140 % ±20.000 % 16.860 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 578 606 4.840 % ±20.000 % 15.160 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 103 92.37 -10.324 % ±20.000 % 9.676 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 175 166.5 -4.858 % ±20.000 % 15.142 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 1.35 m/s [N] 326 313.5 -3.834 % ±20.000 % 16.166 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 527 545 3.412 % ±20.000 % 16.588 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 0.50 m/s [N] 32 37.46 17.052 % ±20.000 % 2.948 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 70 77.81 11.153 % ±20.000 % 8.847 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 127 130.5 2.791 % ±20.000 % 17.209 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 1.35 m/s [N] 233 226.3 -2.892 % ±20.000 % 17.108 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 370 370 -0.010 % ±20.000 % 19.990 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 0.50 m/s [N] 22 26.03 18.304 % ±20.000 % 1.696 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 50 54.15 8.299 % ±20.000 % 11.701 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 87 90.79 4.357 % ±20.000 % 15.643 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 1.25 m/s [N] 137 136.2 -0.582 % ±20.000 % 19.418 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 252 255.7 1.472 % ±20.000 % 18.528 % within

L3 ScreenMF2022, Fig. 6/7 drag, all nets (reported)

reported; 39 rows, 1 of 39 outside the tolerance.

Case Measured Model Error Tolerance Margin Result
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N] 97 84.78 -12.598 % ±20.000 % 7.402 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 200 190.8 -4.623 % ±20.000 % 15.377 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 342 339.1 -0.843 % ±20.000 % 19.157 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.25 m/s [N] 523 529.9 1.314 % ±20.000 % 18.686 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 933 1039 11.313 % ±20.000 % 8.687 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N] 92 73.47 -20.141 % ±20.000 % -0.141 % outside
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 183 165.3 -9.668 % ±20.000 % 10.332 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 316 293.9 -7.000 % ±20.000 % 13.000 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 1.35 m/s [N] 579 535.6 -7.496 % ±20.000 % 12.504 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 908 900 -0.880 % ±20.000 % 19.120 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N] 59 51.7 -12.381 % ±20.000 % 7.619 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 121 116.3 -3.872 % ±20.000 % 16.128 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 211 206.8 -1.999 % ±20.000 % 18.001 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 1.35 m/s [N] 380 376.9 -0.826 % ±20.000 % 19.174 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 609 633.3 3.985 % ±20.000 % 16.015 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 0.50 m/s [N] 37 32.45 -12.286 % ±20.000 % 7.714 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 81 73.02 -9.850 % ±20.000 % 10.150 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 143 129.8 -9.219 % ±20.000 % 10.781 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.25 m/s [N] 218 202.8 -6.955 % ±20.000 % 13.045 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 0 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 415 397.6 -4.202 % ±20.000 % 15.798 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 0.50 m/s [N] 48 49.59 3.314 % ±20.000 % 16.686 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 111 111.6 0.522 % ±20.000 % 19.478 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 200 198.4 -0.819 % ±20.000 % 19.181 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 1.25 m/s [N] 308 309.9 0.631 % ±20.000 % 19.369 % within
N36a Snm 0.364 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 578 607.5 5.101 % ±20.000 % 14.899 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 103 98.66 -4.209 % ±20.000 % 15.791 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 175 175.4 0.231 % ±20.000 % 19.769 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 1.35 m/s [N] 326 319.7 -1.941 % ±20.000 % 18.059 % within
N33a Snm 0.331 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 527 537.2 1.931 % ±20.000 % 18.069 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 0.50 m/s [N] 32 31.85 -0.470 % ±20.000 % 19.530 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 70 71.66 2.374 % ±20.000 % 17.626 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 127 127.4 0.314 % ±20.000 % 19.686 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 1.35 m/s [N] 233 232.2 -0.350 % ±20.000 % 19.650 % within
N26a Snm 0.262 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 370 390.2 5.448 % ±20.000 % 14.552 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 0.50 m/s [N] 22 19.85 -9.780 % ±20.000 % 10.220 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 0.75 m/s [N] 50 44.66 -10.682 % ±20.000 % 9.318 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 1.00 m/s [N] 87 79.39 -8.743 % ±20.000 % 11.257 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 1.25 m/s [N] 137 124.1 -9.451 % ±20.000 % 10.549 % within
N19a Snm 0.193 drag 45 deg 1.75 m/s [N] 252 243.1 -3.515 % ±20.000 % 16.485 % within

L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails)

DISABLED test; 16 rows, 3 of 16 outside the tolerance.

Model minus measurement per case with the tolerance band L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails) L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails) tolerance ±0.12 -0.1 0 0.1 model − measured; shaded: tolerance N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 2010 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 2010: measured 0.8, model 0.8018, error 0.002, tolerance ±0.12 N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 2700 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 2700: measured 0.8, model 0.8281, error 0.028, tolerance ±0.12 N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 3510 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 3510: measured 0.8, model 0.857, error 0.057, tolerance ±0.12 N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 0 deg Rn 2620 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 0 deg Rn 2620: measured 0.8, model 0.8119, error 0.012, tolerance ±0.12 N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 0 deg Rn 1630 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 0 deg Rn 1630: measured 0.8, model 0.7932, error -0.007, tolerance ±0.12 N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 0 deg Rn 2270 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 0 deg Rn 2270: measured 0.8, model 0.8125, error 0.012, tolerance ±0.12 N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 3000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 3000: measured 0.8, model 0.8693, error 0.069, tolerance ±0.12 N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 3510 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 3510: measured 0.8, model 0.8874, error 0.087, tolerance ±0.12 N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 4000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 4000: measured 0.8, model 0.9024, error 0.102, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 2510 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 2510: measured 0.8, model 0.8746, error 0.075, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 3130 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 3130: measured 0.8, model 0.8979, error 0.098, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 3750 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 3750: measured 0.8, model 0.9195, error 0.119, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 5000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 5000: measured 0.8, model 0.9518, error 0.152, tolerance ±0.12 N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 3130 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 3130: measured 0.8, model 0.9037, error 0.104, tolerance ±0.12 N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 3750 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 3750: measured 0.8, model 0.9254, error 0.125, tolerance ±0.12 N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 5000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.80 at 0 deg (DISABLED_, fails): N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 5000: measured 0.8, model 0.9582, error 0.158, tolerance ±0.12

Case Measured Model Error Tolerance Margin Result
N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 2010 0.8 0.8018 0.002 ±0.12 0.118 within
N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 2700 0.8 0.8281 0.028 ±0.12 0.092 within
N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 3510 0.8 0.857 0.057 ±0.12 0.063 within
N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 0 deg Rn 2620 0.8 0.8119 0.012 ±0.12 0.108 within
N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 0 deg Rn 1630 0.8 0.7932 -0.007 ±0.12 0.113 within
N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 0 deg Rn 2270 0.8 0.8125 0.012 ±0.12 0.108 within
N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 3000 0.8 0.8693 0.069 ±0.12 0.051 within
N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 3510 0.8 0.8874 0.087 ±0.12 0.033 within
N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 4000 0.8 0.9024 0.102 ±0.12 0.018 within
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 2510 0.8 0.8746 0.075 ±0.12 0.045 within
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 3130 0.8 0.8979 0.098 ±0.12 0.022 within
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 3750 0.8 0.9195 0.119 ±0.12 0.001 within
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 5000 0.8 0.9518 0.152 ±0.12 -0.032 outside
N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 3130 0.8 0.9037 0.104 ±0.12 0.016 within
N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 3750 0.8 0.9254 0.125 ±0.12 -0.005 outside
N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 5000 0.8 0.9582 0.158 ±0.12 -0.038 outside

L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted)

asserted; 16 rows, 0 of 16 outside the tolerance.

Model minus measurement per case with the tolerance band L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted) L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted) tolerance ±0.12 -0.1 0 0.1 model − measured; shaded: tolerance N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 2000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 2000: measured 0.5, model 0.4874, error -0.013, tolerance ±0.12 N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 2700 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 2700: measured 0.5, model 0.5036, error 0.004, tolerance ±0.12 N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 3510 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 3510: measured 0.5, model 0.5211, error 0.021, tolerance ±0.12 N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 45 deg Rn 1880 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 45 deg Rn 1880: measured 0.5, model 0.4766, error -0.023, tolerance ±0.12 N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 45 deg Rn 2620 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 45 deg Rn 2620: measured 0.5, model 0.4937, error -0.006, tolerance ±0.12 N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 45 deg Rn 1630 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 45 deg Rn 1630: measured 0.5, model 0.4824, error -0.018, tolerance ±0.12 N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 45 deg Rn 2280 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 45 deg Rn 2280: measured 0.5, model 0.4943, error -0.006, tolerance ±0.12 N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 45 deg Rn 3000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 45 deg Rn 3000: measured 0.5, model 0.5286, error 0.029, tolerance ±0.12 N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 45 deg Rn 4000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 45 deg Rn 4000: measured 0.5, model 0.5488, error 0.049, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 2500 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 2500: measured 0.5, model 0.5316, error 0.032, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 3130 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 3130: measured 0.5, model 0.546, error 0.046, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 3750 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 3750: measured 0.5, model 0.5592, error 0.059, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 5000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 5000: measured 0.5, model 0.5788, error 0.079, tolerance ±0.12 N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 3130 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 3130: measured 0.5, model 0.5496, error 0.050, tolerance ±0.12 N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 3750 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 3750: measured 0.5, model 0.5628, error 0.063, tolerance ±0.12 N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 5000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs the text plateau 0.50 at 45 deg (asserted): N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 5000: measured 0.5, model 0.5827, error 0.083, tolerance ±0.12

Case Measured Model Error Tolerance Margin Result
N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 2000 0.5 0.4874 -0.013 ±0.12 0.107 within
N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 2700 0.5 0.5036 0.004 ±0.12 0.116 within
N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 3510 0.5 0.5211 0.021 ±0.12 0.099 within
N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 45 deg Rn 1880 0.5 0.4766 -0.023 ±0.12 0.097 within
N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 45 deg Rn 2620 0.5 0.4937 -0.006 ±0.12 0.114 within
N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 45 deg Rn 1630 0.5 0.4824 -0.018 ±0.12 0.102 within
N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 45 deg Rn 2280 0.5 0.4943 -0.006 ±0.12 0.114 within
N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 45 deg Rn 3000 0.5 0.5286 0.029 ±0.12 0.091 within
N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 45 deg Rn 4000 0.5 0.5488 0.049 ±0.12 0.071 within
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 2500 0.5 0.5316 0.032 ±0.12 0.088 within
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 3130 0.5 0.546 0.046 ±0.12 0.074 within
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 3750 0.5 0.5592 0.059 ±0.12 0.061 within
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 5000 0.5 0.5788 0.079 ±0.12 0.041 within
N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 3130 0.5 0.5496 0.05 ±0.12 0.07 within
N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 3750 0.5 0.5628 0.063 ±0.12 0.057 within
N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 5000 0.5 0.5827 0.083 ±0.12 0.037 within

L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported)

reported; 16 rows, 4 of 16 outside the tolerance.

Model minus measurement per case with the tolerance band L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported) L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported) tolerance ±0.12 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 model − measured; shaded: tolerance N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 2010 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 2010: measured 0.924, model 0.8018, error -0.122, tolerance ±0.12 N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 2700 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 2700: measured 0.926, model 0.8281, error -0.098, tolerance ±0.12 N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 3510 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 3510: measured 0.865, model 0.857, error -0.008, tolerance ±0.12 N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 0 deg Rn 2620 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 0 deg Rn 2620: measured 0.758, model 0.8119, error 0.054, tolerance ±0.12 N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 0 deg Rn 1630 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 0 deg Rn 1630: measured 0.837, model 0.7932, error -0.044, tolerance ±0.12 N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 0 deg Rn 2270 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 0 deg Rn 2270: measured 0.808, model 0.8125, error 0.004, tolerance ±0.12 N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 3000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 3000: measured 0.819, model 0.8693, error 0.050, tolerance ±0.12 N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 3510 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 3510: measured 0.812, model 0.8874, error 0.075, tolerance ±0.12 N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 4000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 4000: measured 0.794, model 0.9024, error 0.108, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 2510 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 2510: measured 0.801, model 0.8746, error 0.074, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 3130 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 3130: measured 0.786, model 0.8979, error 0.112, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 3750 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 3750: measured 0.786, model 0.9195, error 0.133, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 5000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 5000: measured 0.751, model 0.9518, error 0.201, tolerance ±0.12 N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 3130 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 3130: measured 0.855, model 0.9037, error 0.049, tolerance ±0.12 N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 3750 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 3750: measured 0.843, model 0.9254, error 0.082, tolerance ±0.12 N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 5000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 0 deg (reported): N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 5000: measured 0.83, model 0.9582, error 0.128, tolerance ±0.12

Case Measured Model Error Tolerance Margin Result
N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 2010 0.924 0.8018 -0.122 ±0.12 -0.002 outside
N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 2700 0.926 0.8281 -0.098 ±0.12 0.022 within
N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 0 deg Rn 3510 0.865 0.857 -0.008 ±0.12 0.112 within
N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 0 deg Rn 2620 0.758 0.8119 0.054 ±0.12 0.066 within
N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 0 deg Rn 1630 0.837 0.7932 -0.044 ±0.12 0.076 within
N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 0 deg Rn 2270 0.808 0.8125 0.004 ±0.12 0.116 within
N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 3000 0.819 0.8693 0.05 ±0.12 0.07 within
N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 3510 0.812 0.8874 0.075 ±0.12 0.045 within
N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 0 deg Rn 4000 0.794 0.9024 0.108 ±0.12 0.012 within
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 2510 0.801 0.8746 0.074 ±0.12 0.046 within
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 3130 0.786 0.8979 0.112 ±0.12 0.008 within
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 3750 0.786 0.9195 0.133 ±0.12 -0.013 outside
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 0 deg Rn 5000 0.751 0.9518 0.201 ±0.12 -0.081 outside
N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 3130 0.855 0.9037 0.049 ±0.12 0.071 within
N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 3750 0.843 0.9254 0.082 ±0.12 0.038 within
N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 0 deg Rn 5000 0.83 0.9582 0.128 ±0.12 -0.008 outside

L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported)

reported; 16 rows, 0 of 16 outside the tolerance.

Model minus measurement per case with the tolerance band L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported) L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported) tolerance ±0.12 -0.1 0 0.1 model − measured; shaded: tolerance N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 2000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 2000: measured 0.513, model 0.4874, error -0.026, tolerance ±0.12 N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 2700 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 2700: measured 0.519, model 0.5036, error -0.015, tolerance ±0.12 N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 3510 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 3510: measured 0.501, model 0.5211, error 0.020, tolerance ±0.12 N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 45 deg Rn 1880 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 45 deg Rn 1880: measured 0.494, model 0.4766, error -0.017, tolerance ±0.12 N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 45 deg Rn 2620 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 45 deg Rn 2620: measured 0.471, model 0.4937, error 0.023, tolerance ±0.12 N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 45 deg Rn 1630 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 45 deg Rn 1630: measured 0.526, model 0.4824, error -0.044, tolerance ±0.12 N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 45 deg Rn 2280 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 45 deg Rn 2280: measured 0.512, model 0.4943, error -0.018, tolerance ±0.12 N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 45 deg Rn 3000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 45 deg Rn 3000: measured 0.536, model 0.5286, error -0.007, tolerance ±0.12 N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 45 deg Rn 4000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 45 deg Rn 4000: measured 0.536, model 0.5488, error 0.013, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 2500 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 2500: measured 0.493, model 0.5316, error 0.039, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 3130 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 3130: measured 0.49, model 0.546, error 0.056, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 3750 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 3750: measured 0.494, model 0.5592, error 0.065, tolerance ±0.12 N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 5000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 5000: measured 0.487, model 0.5788, error 0.092, tolerance ±0.12 N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 3130 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 3130: measured 0.522, model 0.5496, error 0.028, tolerance ±0.12 N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 3750 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 3750: measured 0.526, model 0.5628, error 0.037, tolerance ±0.12 N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 5000 L4 LocalThroughFlow localCd vs each digitised point, 45 deg (reported): N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 5000: measured 0.521, model 0.5827, error 0.062, tolerance ±0.12

Case Measured Model Error Tolerance Margin Result
N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 2000 0.513 0.4874 -0.026 ±0.12 0.094 within
N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 2700 0.519 0.5036 -0.015 ±0.12 0.105 within
N33a Snm 0.331 localCd 45 deg Rn 3510 0.501 0.5211 0.02 ±0.12 0.1 within
N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 45 deg Rn 1880 0.494 0.4766 -0.017 ±0.12 0.103 within
N36a Snm 0.364 localCd 45 deg Rn 2620 0.471 0.4937 0.023 ±0.12 0.097 within
N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 45 deg Rn 1630 0.526 0.4824 -0.044 ±0.12 0.076 within
N33b Snm 0.328 localCd 45 deg Rn 2280 0.512 0.4943 -0.018 ±0.12 0.102 within
N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 45 deg Rn 3000 0.536 0.5286 -0.007 ±0.12 0.113 within
N26b Snm 0.257 localCd 45 deg Rn 4000 0.536 0.5488 0.013 ±0.12 0.107 within
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 2500 0.493 0.5316 0.039 ±0.12 0.081 within
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 3130 0.49 0.546 0.056 ±0.12 0.064 within
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 3750 0.494 0.5592 0.065 ±0.12 0.055 within
N20b Snm 0.199 localCd 45 deg Rn 5000 0.487 0.5788 0.092 ±0.12 0.028 within
N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 3130 0.522 0.5496 0.028 ±0.12 0.092 within
N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 3750 0.526 0.5628 0.037 ±0.12 0.083 within
N18b Snm 0.185 localCd 45 deg Rn 5000 0.521 0.5827 0.062 ±0.12 0.058 within

Data provenance

Every measured number in the tables above comes from these files (contract C6); the header of each gives the paper, the table or figure, how it was obtained and its uncertainty.

mf2022_table2_nets.csv

tests/data/mf2022_table2_nets.csv, 8 rows.

Field Value
source Moe Foere H, Endresen PC, Bjelland HV (2022), Load coefficients and dimensions of Raschel knitted netting materials in fish farms, J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 144(4) 041301 (MF2022)
location Table 2 (t, Snm, K; PDF p. 3) and Table 1 (s, Sne; PDF p. 2)
kind tabulated
uncertainty as published (values copied exactly); MF2022 give no error bars for Table 1 or Table 2
units snm [-], t_mm [mm], knot_factor [-], s_mm [mm], sne [-]
notes Rows in table order N19a, N26a, N33a, N36a, N18b, N20b, N26b, N33b; each net is identified by its Snm elsewhere in the MF2022 files.
notes t_mm is the Table 2 (image analysis) twine thickness; Table 1 (hand measured) gives the same t except N20b, 2.2 mm in Table 1 and 2.5 mm in Table 2.
notes s_mm and sne are Table 1 (mesh side by frame dimension / mesh count; Sne = 2t/s with the Table 1 t). The a nets were towed in 2020, the b nets in 2019.
notes Text-stated setup (PDF p. 3-4): panel = inner frame B x H = 1.215 x 0.985 m; rho = 998 kg/m3; nu = 1e-6 m2/s; Rn = U t / nu (Eq. 4); frame loads subtracted.
snm t_mm knot_factor s_mm sne
0.193 0.7 1.11 7.8 0.179
0.262 0.7 1.09 5.5 0.255
0.331 2.0 1.21 13.5 0.296
0.364 1.5 1.19 9.0 0.333
0.185 2.5 1.23 32.4 0.15
0.199 2.5 1.16 27.5 0.16
0.257 2.0 1.17 17.3 0.23
0.328 1.3 1.08 8.0 0.32

mf2022_eq10_11.csv

tests/data/mf2022_eq10_11.csv, 4 rows.

Field Value
source Moe Foere H, Endresen PC, Bjelland HV (2022), J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 144(4) 041301 (MF2022)
location Eq. 10 (PDF p. 5) and Eq. 11 (PDF p. 6)
kind equation
uncertainty coefficients copied exactly; the fits are trend lines through the Fig. 9-11 and Fig. 13 data and carry the scatter of those figures (MF2022 note that lift is net-dependent)
units quantity_id [-], theta_deg [deg], c0 [-], c1 [-], c2 [-], snm_min [-], snm_max [-], rn [-]
notes value = c0 + c1*Snm + c2*Snm^2, valid for snm_min <= Snm <= snm_max at Reynolds number rn (Rn = U t / nu, Eq. 4).
notes quantity_id 1 = C_D (Eq. 3, panel area A = B*H and towing speed U), 2 = C_L (Eq. 3), 3 = r = U_r/U, the velocity reduction factor downstream of the panel (Eq. 5, Eq. 11).
notes Eq. 10 as printed: C_D(0) = 1.782 Snm^2 + 1.057 Snm - 0.053; C_D(45) = 1.165 Snm - 0.0919; C_L(45) = 1.693 Snm^2 - 0.217 Snm + 0.022. Eq. 11: r(Snm) = 1.08 - 0.97 Snm, "for Snm in [0.18, 0.36] and Rn approx. 2000".
quantity_id theta_deg c0 c1 c2 snm_min snm_max rn
1 0 -0.053 1.057 1.782 0.18 0.36 2000
1 45 -0.0919 1.165 0 0.18 0.36 2000
2 45 0.022 -0.217 1.693 0.18 0.36 2000
3 0 1.08 -0.97 0 0.18 0.36 2000

mf2022_text_loads.csv

tests/data/mf2022_text_loads.csv, 4 rows.

Field Value
source Moe Foere H, Endresen PC, Bjelland HV (2022), J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 144(4) 041301 (MF2022)
location Results, "Drag and Lift Forces" (PDF p. 5); net attribution from Figs. 6 and 8 (PDF pp. 5-6)
kind text
uncertainty the numbers are copied exactly from the text; MF2022 state no error, and the loads are netting only (frame loads subtracted)
units snm [-], theta_deg [deg], u_m_s [m/s], quantity_id [-], force_N [N]
notes quantity_id 1 = drag (towing direction), 2 = lift (perpendicular). The text gives "maximum values of 416-934 N [drag] and 102-271 N [lift] for a towing velocity of 1.75 m/s" for the 2020 nets (N19a, N26a, N33a, N36a); drag is at 0 deg (Fig. 6), lift at 45 deg (Fig. 8).
notes The text does not name the nets. Drag 416 N = N19a and 934 N = N36a (Fig. 6). Lift 102 N = N19a (Fig. 8). Lift 271 N is N33a in Fig. 8: at 1.75 m/s its triangle (approx. 274 N) lies above the N36a square (approx. 264 N, digitised by A1). The plan's attribution of 271 N to N36a is not supported by Fig. 8.
notes Also text-stated (not rows): doubling U from 0.5 to 1 m/s raises the drag by a factor 3.6-3.8; frame drag at 1.75 m/s 162-185 N (0 deg) and 112-133 N (45 deg); clean frame 114 N and 97 N.
snm theta_deg u_m_s quantity_id force_N
0.193 0 1.75 1 416
0.364 0 1.75 1 934
0.193 45 1.75 2 102
0.331 45 1.75 2 271

mf2022_fig6_fig7_digitised.csv

tests/data/mf2022_fig6_fig7_digitised.csv, 39 rows.

Field Value
source Moe Foere H, Endresen PC, Bjelland HV (2022), J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 144(4) 041301 (MF2022)
location Fig. 6 (drag, theta = 0, PDF p. 5) and Fig. 7 (drag, theta = 45 deg, PDF p. 5)
kind digitised
uncertainty +-6 N for markers that are fully visible; +-10 N for markers partly hidden under another marker (N36a, N33a, N26a at 0.5 and 0.75 m/s); u_m_s +-0.005 m/s
units snm [-], theta_deg [deg], u_m_s [m/s], drag_N [N]
notes Digitised by WP-A1 from the embedded raster figures (843 px wide, 266 ppi): axes calibrated by least squares on the grid lines (Fig. 6: 0.505 px/N, Fig. 7: 0.511 px/N); marker centres from the marker blobs, or from a visible marker edge plus half the marker size where markers overlap. Not eye-read.
notes Nets by Snm: 0.193 N19a, 0.262 N26a, 0.331 N33a, 0.364 N36a (Table 2). N33a and N26a were towed at 1.35 m/s where N36a and N19a were towed at 1.25 m/s. Speeds 0.1, 0.15 and 0.25 m/s are omitted: the markers overlap near zero load (below about 25 N), under the digitising resolution.
notes Fig. 7 N33a at 0.5 m/s is omitted: its marker is hidden. Check against the text: N19a 0 deg at 1.75 m/s = 415 N (text 416 N), N36a = 933 N (text 934 N). Drag ratio F(1.0)/F(0.5) at 0 deg from these rows is 3.46-3.83 (text: 3.6-3.8), within the stated uncertainty.
snm theta_deg u_m_s drag_N
0.364 0 0.50 97
0.364 0 0.75 200
0.364 0 1.00 342
0.364 0 1.25 523
0.364 0 1.75 933
0.331 0 0.50 92
0.331 0 0.75 183
0.331 0 1.00 316
0.331 0 1.35 579
0.331 0 1.75 908
0.262 0 0.50 59
0.262 0 0.75 121
0.262 0 1.00 211
0.262 0 1.35 380
0.262 0 1.75 609
0.193 0 0.50 37
0.193 0 0.75 81
0.193 0 1.00 143
0.193 0 1.25 218
0.193 0 1.75 415
0.364 45 0.50 48
0.364 45 0.75 111
0.364 45 1.00 200
0.364 45 1.25 308
0.364 45 1.75 578
0.331 45 0.75 103
0.331 45 1.00 175
0.331 45 1.35 326
0.331 45 1.75 527
0.262 45 0.50 32
0.262 45 0.75 70
0.262 45 1.00 127
0.262 45 1.35 233
0.262 45 1.75 370
0.193 45 0.50 22
0.193 45 0.75 50
0.193 45 1.00 87
0.193 45 1.25 137
0.193 45 1.75 252

mf2022_fig14_15_local_cd.csv

tests/data/mf2022_fig14_15_local_cd.csv, 37 rows.

Field Value
source Moe Foere H, Endresen PC, Bjelland HV (2022), J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 144(4) 041301 (MF2022)
location Fig. 14 (theta = 0, PDF p. 7) and Fig. 15 (theta = 45 deg, PDF p. 7); plateau values text-stated on PDF p. 7
kind digitised
uncertainty cd_local +-0.015, rn +-30 (marker centres from the embedded raster figures, 1 px = 0.0024 in Cd and 7.2 in Rn)
units snm [-], theta_deg [deg], rn [-], cd_local [-]
notes cd_local is MF2022 Eq. 9, C_d = F_D / (0.5 rho A U^2) * 4 (1 - Snm)^2 / (Snm (1 + r)^2), with r from Eq. 11; Rn = U t / nu with the undisturbed U (Eq. 4).
notes Only points with Rn >= 1000 whose marker is fully or almost fully visible are included: the Rn < 1000 region and the clusters near Rn 1880-2000 and 2500 (several nets overlap) are omitted. N19a and N26a (t = 0.7 mm) have no Rn >= 1000 point that is clear of other markers.
notes Text-stated (PDF p. 7), not rows: "the drag coefficient appears close to constant for Rn \> 1500, with an average value of approximately 0.8" (theta = 0, N33a higher than the others); for theta = 45 deg "for Rn \> 1000, the drag coefficients for all inclined nets are close to constant with an approximate value of 0.5".
notes Nets by Snm: 0.364 N36a, 0.331 N33a, 0.328 N33b, 0.257 N26b, 0.199 N20b, 0.185 N18b (Table 2). Digitised by WP-A1 (axes calibrated on the grid lines; marker class from fill, shape and grey level).
snm theta_deg rn cd_local
0.331 0 1010 0.997
0.331 0 1500 0.953
0.331 0 2010 0.924
0.331 0 2700 0.926
0.331 0 3510 0.865
0.364 0 1120 0.881
0.364 0 1500 0.852
0.364 0 2620 0.758
0.328 0 1630 0.837
0.328 0 2270 0.808
0.257 0 3000 0.819
0.257 0 3510 0.812
0.257 0 4000 0.794
0.199 0 2510 0.801
0.199 0 3130 0.786
0.199 0 3750 0.786
0.199 0 5000 0.751
0.185 0 3130 0.855
0.185 0 3750 0.843
0.185 0 5000 0.830
0.331 45 2000 0.513
0.331 45 2700 0.519
0.331 45 3510 0.501
0.364 45 1130 0.495
0.364 45 1880 0.494
0.364 45 2620 0.471
0.328 45 1630 0.526
0.328 45 2280 0.512
0.257 45 3000 0.536
0.257 45 4000 0.536
0.199 45 2500 0.493
0.199 45 3130 0.490
0.199 45 3750 0.494
0.199 45 5000 0.487
0.185 45 3130 0.522
0.185 45 3750 0.526
0.185 45 5000 0.521